If you wish to see information about past results and client testimonials for our law firm, please read and acknowledge the information below. The following page contains information about our past results, client testimonials, and statements regarding the quality of this law firm. The information has not been reviewed or approved by The Florida Bar.

You should know: The facts and circumstances of your case may not be the same as some of our past cases and may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided. All results of cases handled by The Caimano Law Firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials. The results and testimonials displayed on the following page are not necessarily representative of results obtained by this firm or of the experience of all clients or others with this firm. No two cases are the same, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

I acknowledge that I have read and understand the above information and would like to view information.

I do not want to view the following information.

 

You are here

Caimano Law Firm, P.A. | Case Results

SENTENCE MODIFICATIONS/CORRECTIONS:

Life Sentence Vacated, Client Re-Sentenced to Time Served.
Case #03-CF-18640, Hillsborough County


FEDERAL COURT:

8:14-CR-113-T-17EAJ

Charge:  Aggravated Identity Theft

Outcome:  Below Guideline Sentence of Probation

8:12-CR-385-JSM-MAP

Charge:  Possession of Cocaine WITD, Possession of a Firearm During Trafficking

Outcome: Significant Below Guideline Sentence of Probation

8:12-CR-65-T-27-AEP

Charge: Possession of over 280 grams of Cocaine WITD

Outcome:  Jury returned verdict of lesser charge

STATE PRE-FILING 
Hiring an attorney prior to the charge being formally filed allows the attorney to present arguments to the State as to why the case should not be filed.

Attempted Murder Charge Dropped

Case #14-CF-6360, Hillsborough County

Armed Trafficking Charge Dropped

Case #09-CF-2500, Hillsborough County 
 
Atempted Murder (Firearm) Charge Dropped

Case #08-CF-14747, Hillsborough County 
 
Burglary Charge Dropped

Case #09-CF-1827, Hillsborough County

Possession of Cocaine (WITD) Dropped

Case #08-CF-25139, Hillsborough County 

Kidnapping, Sexual Battery Charge Dropped

Case #08-CF-18006, Hillsborough County 

Conspiracy To Traffic Drugs Charge Dropped

Case #09-CF-4978, Hillsborough County


Jury Trials Verdicts

Recent Jury Trials where the client was acquitted of the charges against him/her:

Not Guilty of Aggravated Battery Deadly Weapon
Hillsborough County, FL

Not Guilty of Trafficking in Cocaine
Hernando County, FL
 
Not Guilty of Armed Kidnapping, Sexual Battery
Hillsborough County Division H

Not Guilty of Attempted Murder w/ Firearm (x3) 
Hillsborough CountyDivision B

Not Guilty of Tampering with Evidence, possession of marijuana, opposing an officer
Hillsborough County Division C

Not Guilty of Possession of Oxycodone
Hillsborough County Division E

Not Guilty of Trafficking in Cocaine (5 Kilograms)
Hillsborough County Divison A

Not Guilty of Delivery of Cocaine, Possession of Cocaine
Hillsborough County Division G

Not Guilty of Attempted Murder (Knife/Baseball Bat)
Hillsborough County Division G

Not Guilty of Armed Kidnapping (x4), Armed Robbery (x4)
Hillsborough County Division G

Not Guilty of Delivery of Cocaine within 1000 feet of a School
HIllborough County Division A

Not Guilty of Armed Robbery (Knife)
Hillsborough County Division B


Motions Results:

Charge:  Trafficking in Illegal Drugs

Hernando County, Florida

Motion: Motion to Suppress based on Stale Search Warrant.

Outcome:  Motion granted, case dismissed.

Charge:  Felon in Possession of a Firearm Dismissed

Hillsborough County Division I

Motion:  Motion to Suppress based on unlawful stop

Outcome:  Motion Granted, case dismissed

Charge: Trafficking in Cocaine (2 ounces) Dismissed
Hillsborough County Division I
Motion: Motion to Suppress based on unlawful prolonged detention.
Outcome: Motion granted, case dismissed. 

Charge: Trafficking in Heroin
Hillsborough County Division A
Motion: Motion to Suppress, unlawful stop
Outcome: Motion granted, case dismissed

Charge: Possession of Marijuana <20 grams dismissed 
Hillsborough County misd. Division D
Motion: Motion to Suprpress based on illegal traffic stop
Outcome: Motion granted, case dismissed.

Charge: Felon in Possession of a Firearm, Possession of Cannabis WITD dismissed
Hillsborough County Division G 
Motion: C-4 Motion to Dismiss
Outcome: Motion granted, charge dismissed.

Charge: Possession of Cocaine 
Hillsborough County Division D 
Motion: C-4 Motion to Dismiss
Outcome: Motion granted, charge dismissed

Charge: Possession of Cocaine WITD
Hillsborough County Division G 
Motion: C-4 Motion to Dismiss
Outcome: Motion granted, case dismissed

Charge: Possession of Cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia
Hillsborough County Division B
Motion: C-4 Motion to Dismiss
Outcome: Motion granted, case dismissed

 

Appellate Victories:

 

2008 Appeals:

 

Pilieci v. State.  Hillsborough County, Felony Division G.

This was a Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office (HCSO) search warrant case where the trial court denied the motion to suppress.  The importance of this case is that is the first time in Florida that a appellate court found that a transaction that occurred less than 30 days from application of search warrant was stale.

 

The Second District Court of Appeal agreed with the Defense’s argument that the single drug transaction, which occurred 29 days prior to the application for search warrant, caused the warrant to be stale.  The 2nd DCA also held that the detective making application for the search warrant omitted material facts from his application, and if included would have negated the finding of probable cause.  The case, which included two trafficking charges and a firearm charge  was reversed and later dismissed.

 

 You can read the opinion by clicking on this link:

 

 DHSMV v. Abbott.  Hillsborough County, Appeal from DMV administrative hearing.

 

 The DHSMV appealed our victorious appeal of the administrative suspension of Abbott’s driver’s license.

 

 After over a year of litigation, the 2nd DCA finally sided with us that Mr. Abbott should never of been pulled over and cited for a violation of Chapter 316.